Tulisan 2
Research Method
dan Data Analysis Methods
REVIEW :
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
AS A BASIS FOR DETERMINING STRATEGY
OF COOPERATIVE UNITS IN AMBON CITY
OLEH :
Rumra Suryanti Ismail
Universitas Kristen Indonesia (UKI) Maluku
E-mail: yantiismail22@yahoo.com
Ot Pattimaipauw SK Street 15 RT/RW 005/02,
Ambon 97115, Indonesia
Berisi :
Research Method
The internal factors
(organizational and institutional, business and the business, service, and
participation of members) and external ones (networks) of the cooperatives
are analyzed and categorized according to the level of
performance. Later on, based on
these performance levels, the researcher determined a new
strategy that is suitable for
the development of cooperatives in the future. Ambon city
was chosen as a research
location for the reason that every year, the increasing
number of active to inactive cooperatives showed a decrease in quality of their
performance.
The population covers
the Village Unit Cooperatives (KUD) in Ambon. Based on
the data from the Office of Cooperative in Maluku
Province, it is known there are 16
cooperatives in the city of Ambon, and these were used
for the population. Yet, the sample
is selected by 8 cooperatives that have specific
requirements. The sample was taken
by accident or purposive sampling. The sampling in this
case is limited to the cooperatives
that meet certain criteria and considerations such as a)
they have been incorporated
at least 1 year, b) they have conducted the Annual
Members Meeting (RAT 2009), and c) they are still active in 2009.
The data were taken
from direct respondents or the primary data for the research
samples and all were related to the secondary data.
a. Primary data were collected by interviews,
with a list of questions (questionnaire) to be
filled by the respondents, regarding questions
relating to the
assessment of study
Table 3
Scoring and Weighting
variables on the performance of cooperatives
concerned.
b. Secondary data were obtained from various agencies in
the form of reports or documents
originating from the Central Cooperative Village Unit
Cooperatives and cooperatives.
The data were
collected and measured using the Rating Scale. For analysis purposes,
the instruments referring to the response of each item
was scored 1-4., ranging from very positive to very negative. For examples,
excellent (score 4), good (score 3), fairly good (score 2), and poor (score 1).
Furthermore, these variables were weighted according to the importance of each
variable. The weight given to reflect the perception of the importance of one
particular factor compared with other factors (Siagian, 2007). The weight is
based the cooperatives’ response to these factors of importance as shown in
Table 3.
The variables were
measured and grouped according to the value that indicates
the level of performance. The performance assessment
describes the level of the cooperatives’ success, from excellent to poor.
Performance levels are grouped as shown in Table 4.
To test the validity,
the researcher used a test of construct validity by using item
analysis, which
calculates the correlation
between scores coefficient item and total score using a
significance level of 5%. The
approach used to test the validity of the item (question)
is the Product Moment correlation
equation. The reliability test used a formula coefficient
alpha Cronbach. Reliability of an
instrument will be accepted if it has a minimum value of
reliability coefficient 0.60
(Sigit, 2001) so it can be interpreted that the instrument
can be used as a reliable data collection.
Data Analysis Methods
Data analysis was done
in three stages, namely through descriptive analysis and
analysis of Cooperative Capacity (CCA) and the Primary
Strategy Selection Matrix analysis
or Basic. Descriptive analysis was performed to determine
the frequency distribution
of answers from the questionnaires filled by the
respondents. The answers include
internal environmental variables (organizational and
institutional, business and
the business, service, and participation of members) and
external environmental variables
(networks). By having the frequency distribution of items
or variables and the
average score of the item or variable, it can show the
state of the item or variable under
study. The Cooperative Capacity Analysis (CCA) is a form
of cooperative performance
analysis based on the ability of cooperatives that are
influenced by internal and external
environment. The analysis was performed using a scoring
technique. As for the stages
in the CCA analysis can be performed as follows:
1. Summing the item scores of the respondent's answer,
divided by the number of items tested. This applies to each indicator.
2. Summing the scores of each indicator variable, divided
by the number of indicators in the test.
3. Multiplying the total score of indicators by weighting
variables that have been determined
to get a weighted score. This was done to determine the
capability of each variable in the form of performance
4. The total weighted score was further divided by the
total weight of the indicator.
These results can indicate the level of cooperative
performance.
5. The cooperatives are grouped according to the
predetermined level of performance.
Next is to create the
Main Strategy Selection Matrix Analysis. The use of matrices
in this study is intended to put the performance of
cooperatives in the areas or strategies
in accordance with internal and external conditions of
the cooperatives. The main
strategy of selection matrix is a reliable technique in
choosing a strategy of the parent
cooperative. This metric is to conduct internal or
external pressure for growth or
profitability (Pearc, Robinson, 2007). The selection of
strategies in the strategy of the
parent cooperatives will go through the steps as follows:
1. The cooperative performance levels that have been
analyzed are placed in the field of
the matrix according to the strengths or weaknesses of
internal and external factors
and the opportunities and threats that are faced by these
cooperatives.
2. After the field of the matrix (Quadrant I, II, II and
IV), then define the main strategies that can be done.
3. Implement the chosen strategy of the par ent
appropriate cooperative premises in their
operational functions.
Nama / NPM : Sarina Nurcahaya/ 28211249
Kelas / Tahun :
2EB09 / 2010-2011
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar